JimStoner
12 Jun 2008, 9:38 AM
Hello,
I have a view that contains a few thousand documents, which use reader fields to control access by account/group. For someone with access to all the documents, the Ext.nd view paging bar indicates there are 161 pages, and they can navigate them correctly.
However, someone with access to only a few hundred documents runs into trouble. The paging bar still says there are 161 pages (instead of the 10 or so pages that he actually has access to), and the next/previous buttons are therefore a little wonky. Depending on where his documents are within the overall view, he may have to hit the next page button quite a few times before it actually advances to the next set of documents, etc.
I understand the reason why this happens. I'm just curious if there is any plan to fix that in a future release, and if anyone has a workaround for the meantime. One choice is to make it a categorized view based on the username, but that will only work if the reader fields are username based rather than role based. If they are role based, and someone has multiple roles, the categorized approach becomes pretty difficult.
Thanks,
Jim
I have a view that contains a few thousand documents, which use reader fields to control access by account/group. For someone with access to all the documents, the Ext.nd view paging bar indicates there are 161 pages, and they can navigate them correctly.
However, someone with access to only a few hundred documents runs into trouble. The paging bar still says there are 161 pages (instead of the 10 or so pages that he actually has access to), and the next/previous buttons are therefore a little wonky. Depending on where his documents are within the overall view, he may have to hit the next page button quite a few times before it actually advances to the next set of documents, etc.
I understand the reason why this happens. I'm just curious if there is any plan to fix that in a future release, and if anyone has a workaround for the meantime. One choice is to make it a categorized view based on the username, but that will only work if the reader fields are username based rather than role based. If they are role based, and someone has multiple roles, the categorized approach becomes pretty difficult.
Thanks,
Jim