PDA

View Full Version : i finish to bild my site free football with ext js what do you think?


koko2589
31 Jul 2009, 12:23 AM
what do you think?
here my site demo

portal here

http://itoto1.com/

:))=D>:-?



desktop here

http://itoto1.com/index2.html
Animal
31 Jul 2009, 6:00 AM
That's pretty good work.

Obviously I don't understand it, but you're getting the hang of it.

You do have a problem using so many IFRAMEs.

It's not necessary to use IFRAMES if you design your app right. Load script which creates the new Portlet, do NOT load HTML into an IFRAME.

You surely see that the IFRAME stops dragging activity, so it makes the portal unusable.
koko2589
31 Jul 2009, 6:23 AM
That's pretty good work.

Obviously I don't understand it, but you're getting the hang of it.

You do have a problem using so many IFRAMEs.

It's not necessary to use IFRAMES if you design your app right. Load script which creates the new Portlet, do NOT load HTML into an IFRAME.

You surely see that the IFRAME stops dragging activity, so it makes the portal unusable.


tankyou




you say to use


xtype: 'iframepanel',
id: 'dawelbeit-info',
//title:'IT with Passion',
frameConfig : {id:'dawelbeit-info'},
defaultSrc : function(){return ' somepage.html ' (http://itoto1.com/ext-2.0.1/examples/desktop/chat2.html');}

not to use


html: '<body ><center><iframe width="100%" height="270" align="center" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" src="somepage.html"/></IFRAME><center /></body>'
Animal
31 Jul 2009, 6:30 AM
No.

no iframes.

Just put your own Components in as portlets.
steffenk
31 Jul 2009, 6:42 AM
Hi,

i know arabic uses rtl, but also bottom-to-top?
koko2589
31 Jul 2009, 6:51 AM
Hi,

i know arabic uses rtl, but also bottom-to-top?

its not arab im from israel its hebrew >:)

http://itoto1.com/flags/32/Israel.png
mschwartz
31 Jul 2009, 6:51 AM
That's pretty good work.

Obviously I don't understand it, but you're getting the hang of it.

You do have a problem using so many IFRAMEs.

It's not necessary to use IFRAMES if you design your app right. Load script which creates the new Portlet, do NOT load HTML into an IFRAME.

You surely see that the IFRAME stops dragging activity, so it makes the portal unusable.

henricd's managed iframe has functions you can call to shim over the iframes so dragging works proper.

While I don't think it's a great idea to use iframes and load in ExtJS to every one of them, I see plenty of benefit in using them otherwise. For starters, when you close a tab with an iframe in it (an example), the browser frees up all the memory used by the iframe, its content, and the scripts that ran in it. I'm pretty sure you also get more parallelism with iframes, as each gets its own http socket to the server. You can also render HTML from a different WWW site in the iframe, which is what it looks like for most of the content on the football page.

For most of what I see on the football page, iframes are perfectly fine.
steffenk
31 Jul 2009, 10:55 AM
i like the MIF, but i dislike the weight of 100KB extra.
@koko2589: sry, hebrew, ok i'm not used to both ;)
koko2589
4 Aug 2009, 7:09 AM
i cenge my site to desktop
http://itoto1.com/index.html

the old demo is here
http://itoto1.com/index2.html
mschwartz
4 Aug 2009, 7:12 AM
i like the MIF, but i dislike the weight of 100KB extra.
@koko2589: sry, hebrew, ok i'm not used to both ;)

100K is puny compared to the 1.4G firefox gobbles up if I leave it run over the weekend

:D
steffenk
4 Aug 2009, 7:17 AM
hehe - i know what you mean.

I have seen some example sites which takes such long time loading that it isn't fun.
100KB here, 100KB there and you are at a point where you need a app loader to tell the users they have to wait. Some sites needs so long to show the app loader that many users quit before seing anything.

Don't misunderstand, but for simple iframe usage i can do it with some codes of js without MIF.
See example of lightbox use html.
koko2589
4 Aug 2009, 7:22 AM
here
its not finiced so jast cencge css desktop
desktop demo here
http://itoto1.com/
:-/
portal demo here
http://itoto1.com/index2.html
mschwartz
4 Aug 2009, 7:48 AM
hehe - i know what you mean.

I have seen some example sites which takes such long time loading that it isn't fun.
100KB here, 100KB there and you are at a point where you need a app loader to tell the users they have to wait. Some sites needs so long to show the app loader that many users quit before seing anything.

Don't misunderstand, but for simple iframe usage i can do it with some codes of js without MIF.
See example of lightbox use html.

You can set up the server to gzip that 100KB for the download, and once it's in the browser cache, it should be fast enough loading.

Most Ext based sites I visit take > 10 seconds to load. My app takes ~6.
steffenk
4 Aug 2009, 8:17 AM
do you use any css/js-merger? compressors/minifiers?
mschwartz
4 Aug 2009, 10:08 AM
do you use any css/js-merger? compressors/minifiers?

For production, yes, but I'm seeing 6 sec. to load dozens of .js files during development.

Just now, 5.28 sec. for 165 requests (that's CSS, js, images).
koko2589
18 Aug 2009, 11:26 AM
http://extremetracking.com/open;unique?login=itoto100

http://itoto1.com/

what do think??

:))