[by esoteric]

That would be wonderful. I am willing to test anything you come up with, thanks Saki.

[by esoteric]

Correct there isn't a really easy way to do it, however there is a user extension that aims to help, that you can check out in the User Extensions section of the Wiki. Also one of the SDKs out there...

[by esoteric]

Any more thoughts Saki? Or how to go about implementing this? :)

Thanks.

[by esoteric]

Check you Build Your Own feature on the site to wrap only the components you need.

[by esoteric]

Well I am wanting this app to behave more like an FTP client you see in the world and to give the owner of the app the potential to restrict the amount of files uploaded at one time.

If you look...

[by esoteric]

singleUpload: false <-- perfect, however I want to make the requests dependent on the request ahead of it. So lets say an option of "simultaneousTransfers: 2", two will upload at the same time, when...

[by esoteric]

Perhaps I am completely misunderstanding, but when I add multiple files to the UploadPanel via the add button, they all show up as a list, then when I click the Upload button each file's spinner...

[by esoteric]

Yes very much so. Even if one fails I still want the next one to upload, just have the icon turn to the error icon you already use. :)

[by esoteric]

oh I see, so all the files go in a single post to the server, but all the spinners fire off and then the progress request kicks in? I am following you now.

I was thinking it work like one file got...

[by esoteric]

I have tried setting singleUpload: true but all the files still upload at the same time when I click the upload button.

[by esoteric]

Saki, it seems that the "concurrent" boolean option in FileUploader doesn't work. All files still get uploaded at the same time. Anyone else run into this problem? Thanks!

And thank you for your...

[by esoteric]

Very true, my bad. Yeah someone will probably have to post it for you, ExtJS doesn't usually offer downloads of old versions.

[by esoteric]

Maybe because they changed the location. You need to check out the actual download page.

http://extjs.com/products/extjs/download.php?dl=extjs21

[by esoteric]

Spam Anyone?

[by esoteric]

They work just fine.

[by esoteric]

Add event handlers to the fields that check for focus and blur, which upon either one you could validate the field, then once all have been, then just call up the submit button and enable it.

[by esoteric]

Try setting icon: '', or iconCls to a class that has the s.gif as the background for each node.

Thats just off the top of my head.

[by esoteric]

I wouldn't think so, you would have to try it and find out.

[by esoteric]

Why open a new thread? Please go see the License Change thread. (Use the search feature)

Can a moderator please merge or delete this.

[by esoteric]

Yeah I have to agree with dantheman, where is the one-year limitation? There is a year limitation on support, but not the license.

[by esoteric]

I concede that point, however I hope those who use ExtJS 2.0.2 still follow the "spirit" of the conditions for the sake of supporting the Ext team.

And I am still against any forking of this...

[by esoteric]

@HartlepoolLad - You can definitely post and talk here all you want even though you don't own a license, it wasn't my intention or anyone else's to say you could not.

@dantheman - I am arguing...

[by esoteric]

Its not about not wanting to, its about being forced to, I have no project right now that I am getting released so I have no fear, just a general dislike of the GPL that motivate my posts.

People...

[by esoteric]

@dantheman, I am definitely not an official representative of ExtJS, just purely arguing what the license states, whether or not "may" is commanding or not, I think would be classified as arguing...

[by esoteric]

@rule3 - Incorrect, you still had to agree to the below statements to be able to use Ext 2.0.2 and lower under the LGPL. Which included non-profit manner.