Turkiyenin en sevilen filmlerinin yer aldigi porno internet sitemiz olan ve sex tarzi bir site olan sitemiz gercekten dillere destan bir durumda herkesin sevdigi bir site olarak tarihe gececege benziyor. Sitenin en belirgin ozelliklerinden birisi de Turkiyede gercekten kaliteli ve muntazam, duzenli siteleri olmamasidir. Bu yuzden iste. Ayrica en net goruntu kalitesine sahip adresinde yayinlanmaktadir.
Gelmiş geçmiş en büyük porno sitemiz olan 2pe de her zaman en kaliteli pornoları sunmayı hedefledik. Diğer video sitemiz olan vuam da ise hd porno ağırlıklı çalışmalara başladık.
Although it still is in the API list, Ext.form.CompositeField doesn't have an API page anymore and trying to use it returns the following error: Cannot create an instance of unrecognized alias: widget.compositefield.
It was still present in PR2. Does this mean it will no longer be supported or merely that it has been temporarily removed? In the former case, will there be a replacement?
Thanks for the heads up. As far as I can judge, the issue has been clarified in [PR4], by removing any mention of Ext.form.CompositeField from the API index. Pending its being supported again, I guess. Anyway, it is consistent at least.
Any idea when compositefield will return to API ?
Outside forms, there is no problem, fieldcontainers can replace them.
But I use compositefields quiet often in my forms, and there fieldcontainers can't replace them.
For example my company selector is a compositefield of code and name comboboxes returning 1 value (id_company). The same with zip and location comboboxes returning 1 value (id_location).
Or a drilldown compositefield of company+project+task comboboxes returning 1 value (id_task).
As I would like to migrate to Ext4 as soon as possible, is there (in the mean time I hope) an alternative way to simulate compositefields in forms ?
To clarify my problem: compositefields in 3.4 have a "name" config and have value setters and getters, like any other form field. Up to me to override setValue/getValue for updating the individual fields in this composite.
However, fieldcontainers in 4.1 don't have this config and methods...
Anyone out there who can give me a workaround for this problem ?