[EXTJSIV-3455] Store: get index of record after add

[J4y]

hey,
i tried to get the index of a record i added to store.
But if i do a store.indexOfId(...) after store.add(...)/store.insert(...), it always returns "-1"...

thx for help,
j4y

[pdesmet]

The record doesn't have an index but if you do an add the index will be 0. (Ext.data.Store-method-add)

If you do an insert then you can define the index. Ext.data.Store-method-insert

[J4y]

Thats not the problem
The record is definitely added to store. Also if i define a special index with store.insert, the record was successfully added to store (its displayed in dataview).

The problem is, that store.indexOfId() or store.indexOf() returns "-1", althought record is in store

[pdesmet]

That is because the store doesn't add an index to it.
If you look at it in firebug, in your console, you will see the records but you will see that the added row has no index.
Maybe this is a bug or maybe it was intented.

[J4y]

i can't see any reason why it could be intented

maybe anybody has got another solution for my problem:

The store is used in an Ext.view.View.
After adding a new record to store, i want to select that new record in dataview automatically....

[hendricd]

@J4Y-

Can you post how you are creating the record, and what ID you are using when calling store.indexOfId(??)?

[J4y]

The store has no model definition (using fields-property), so i don't create record with Ext.create...

App.getNavigationStore().add({
  id: 'view_quicksearch',
  name: 'Suchergebnisse'
});
App.getNavigationPanel().select(App.getNavigationStore().indexOfId('view_quicksearch')); 

But i also have this problem in a grid where i create a new instance of a model...

[hendricd]

@J4y--

This is a bug.

in the absence of a formal Model definition(fields config), the idProperty defaults to 'id'. But the ModelManager.create method does not yet consider that. Use this override while we get this fixed:

Ext.ModelManager.create = function(config, name, id) {
        var con = (typeof name == 'function') ? name : this.types[name || config.name];

        return new con(config, id || config[con.prototype.idProperty]);
    };

[J4y]

thx dude, you saved my day
but this occurs also with a formal model definition:

var model = Ext.ModelManager.create({}, GLOBALS.MODEL_NAME_EMPLOYEE);
....update fields....
Ext.getStore(GLOBALS.STORE_ID_EMPLOYEE).insert(0, model);

alert(model.get('id'));
alert(Ext.getStore(GLOBALS.STORE_ID_EMPLOYEE).indexOfId(model.get('id'))); 

[pdesmet]

Nice to see this became a bug, it was just planning to report this bug.