1. #1
    Sencha User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    20
    Vote Rating
    1
    gilfeather is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default Ext.data.Model missing store property

    Ext.data.Model missing store property


    The store property is a documented property of Ext.data.Model and as such can be relied upon for customer use. It was not present in the 4.1 alpha release and was reported at that time. It is also not present in the 4.1 beta release. It seams to be replaced with a stores property which appears to be an array containing 1 element.

    I have not seen mention of this in any 4.1 release documentation or backward compatability guide. If I missed it my apology and please point me to it.

    In the mean time can I rely on stores being an array with the first element pointing back to the store?

  2. #2
    Sencha - Senior Forum Manager mitchellsimoens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    33,582
    Vote Rating
    434
    mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of

      0  

    Default


    A model can be used by many stores, this is the reason for this change.
    Mitchell Simoens @SenchaMitch
    Sencha Inc, Senior Forum Manager
    ________________
    http://www.JSONPLint.com - Source to lint your JSONP!

    Check out my GitHub, lots of nice things for Ext JS 4 and Sencha Touch 2
    https://github.com/mitchellsimoens

    Think my support is good? Get more personalized support via a support subscription. https://www.sencha.com/store/

    Need more help with your app? Hire Sencha Services services@sencha.com

    Want to learn Sencha Touch 2? Check out Sencha Touch in Action that is almost in print!

    When posting code, please use BBCode's CODE tags.

  3. #3
    Sencha User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    20
    Vote Rating
    1
    gilfeather is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    Umm, ok. So we have an undocumented breaking change caused by undocumented new features. Can you see where I might be going with this?

    If this were an isolated case I wouldn't even blink but this has been an on going issue for quite some time. You guys need to step up to the plate. Wild west software development (seemed to start some time after version 2) needs to be a thing of the past. Think documentation, compatability, customers, unit testing, testing of any kind, etc....

  4. #4
    Sencha - Ext JS Dev Team evant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    15,067
    Vote Rating
    96
    evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold

      0  

    Default


    This was an oversight, I've updated the API changes page here: http://www.sencha.com/forum/showthre...29-API-Changes

    Thanks.
    Evan Trimboli
    Sencha Developer
    Twitter - @evantrimboli
    Don't be afraid of the source code!

  5. #5
    Sencha User ykey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    245
    Vote Rating
    25
    ykey has a spectacular aura about ykey has a spectacular aura about

      0  

    Default


    It isn't obvious to me looking at the source why a model needs to know what stores it is associated with. Is it just to reduce the number of observable listeners between models and stores?

  6. #6
    Sencha - Ext JS Dev Team evant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    15,067
    Vote Rating
    96
    evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold evant is a splendid one to behold

      0  

    Default


    Pretty much, yeah. Records tend to be "throwaway" objects, so binding listeners is rather heavy for them.
    Evan Trimboli
    Sencha Developer
    Twitter - @evantrimboli
    Don't be afraid of the source code!

  7. #7
    Sencha - Community Support Team mankz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Helsingborg, Sweden
    Posts
    2,454
    Vote Rating
    48
    mankz is a jewel in the rough mankz is a jewel in the rough mankz is a jewel in the rough

      0  

    Default


    Will there be a compat layer for 4.1? Should be easy to set

    Code:
    this.store=this.stores[0];
    to solve bw compat. Don't think users will appreciate another release with breaking api changes.