Gelmiş geçmiş en büyük porno sitemiz olan 2pe de her zaman en kaliteli pornoları sunmayı hedefledik. Diğer video sitemiz olan vuam da ise hd porno ağırlıklı çalışmalara başladık.

    Thank you for reporting this bug. We will make it our priority to review this report.
  1. #1
    Sencha User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5
    Vote Rating
    0
    buronix is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Exclamation Ext.clone bug with firefox [firefox bug not expected by extjs]

    Ext.clone bug with firefox [firefox bug not expected by extjs]


    Sorry for the previous bad bug report.

    Ext version tested:
    • Ext 4.0.7
    Browser versions tested against:
    • Firefox 10.0.2 (Unix)
    Description:
    • With a kind of Extjs own created object (I tested it with a Ext.data.Model record), when
      Ext.clone executed
      var type = toString.call(item);
      The type of the record is and Ext.clone not clone the object and return the original item.
    • it is a Firefox bug: [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684601]

    Steps to reproduce the problem:
    • Create an Ext object ( I tested with Ext.data.Model) and debug with toString.call(obj)

    The result that was expected:
    • [object Object]

    The result that occurs instead:
    • [xpconnect wrapped native prototype]
    Possible fix:

    var type = Object.prototype.toString.call(item);

    Operating System:
    • Unix
    ------------
    Rubén Burón Rodrigo.
    StackOps Developer.

  2. #2
    Sencha - Senior Forum Manager mitchellsimoens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Gainesville, FL
    Posts
    36,521
    Vote Rating
    814
    mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute mitchellsimoens has a reputation beyond repute

      0  

    Default


    So you tried Ext.clone on a record?
    Mitchell Simoens @SenchaMitch
    Sencha Inc, Senior Forum Manager
    ________________
    Check out my GitHub, lots of nice things for Ext JS 4 and Sencha Touch 2
    https://github.com/mitchellsimoens

    Think my support is good? Get more personalized support via a support subscription. https://www.sencha.com/store/

    Need more help with your app? Hire Sencha Services services@sencha.com

    Want to learn Sencha Touch 2? Check out Sencha Touch in Action that is in print!

    When posting code, please use BBCode's CODE tags.

  3. #3
    Sencha User
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    5
    Vote Rating
    0
    buronix is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Post


    Quote Originally Posted by mitchellsimoens View Post
    So you tried Ext.clone on a record?
    I only tried, I needed to clone the data of an array of records without the references, but when I see the code of clone, I realized I need to copy the data, not clone it.

    Finally I use other method to "clone"(copy) the data of an array of records:

    PHP Code:
    /**
    * function to return a copy of the records without references
    *@param records[] array of records to copy
    *@return newData[] the array with the copy of the records
    */
    copyRecords     :       function(records){
           var 
    newData   =  []
           
    Ext.Array.each(records,function(recordi)
           {
                   
    newData[i]     =    {};
                   
    record.fields.each(function(item,index)
                   {
                             
    newData[i][item.name]    =    record.get(item.name);
                   });
           }
           return 
    newData;

    But if you create a Model manually you can check the bug with the example.

Thread Participants: 1

Tags for this Thread