Accessing hasMany object localy not working?

[JFFortierQc]

What am I doing wrong?
In Sencha Touch 1, it was possible to call a Store like that this.tvProviders(); where tvProviders is the name in the hasMany properties. In Sencha Touch 1, that did return a tvProvidersStore object.

Ext.define("MyApp.model.configs.TvProviderList", {extend: "Ext.data.Model",
        configs: {
            hasMany: {model: 'MyApp.model.configs.TvProvider', name: 'tvProviders'}
        },
        
        constructor: function() {
            this.callParent(arguments);
            
            var tvpStore = this.tvProviders();
        }
    }
);

In Sencha Touch 2 I get this error : TypeError: 'undefined' is not a function (evaluating 'this.tvProviders()')
Any idea how to solve that. I really need to access it locally. Can't load external data by Proxy. I want to be able to add TvProvider Class object in that like :
var tvpStore = this.tvProviders();
tvpStore.add(aTvProviderInstance);

[mitchellsimoens]

This is working for me:

Ext.define('Search', {
    extend : 'Ext.data.Model',

    config : {
        fields  : [
            'id',
            'query'
        ],

        hasMany : {
            model : 'Tweet',
            name  : 'tweets'
        }
    },

    constructor : function() {
        this.callParent(arguments);

        var store = this.tweets();

        console.log(store);
    }
});

Ext.define('Tweet', {
    extend : 'Ext.data.Model',

    config : {
        fields : [
            'id',
            'text',
            'from_user'
        ]
    }
});

Ext.application({
    name : 'Test',

    launch : function () {

        new Search({query: 'Sencha Touch'});

    }
});

[ntkonstantinov]

I'm having a similar issue about this one. Let's say for example I want to add a collection of tweets, when instantiating the Search model. The problem I'm facing is that this collection is not stored in the data holder, but rather in the raw property.

var test = new Search({query: 'Sencha Touch', tweets: [{id: 'testId1', text: 'testText1', from_user: 'sampleUser1'}, {id: 'testId2', text: 'testText2', from_user: 'sampleUser2'}]});
[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.699219)][/COLOR]
Object



undefined
test
[COLOR=rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.699219)][/COLOR]
Object
_data: Object
data: Object
id: "ext-record-326"
query: "Sencha Touch"
__proto__: Object

id: "ext-record-326"
internalId: "ext-record-326"
modified: Object
phantom: true
raw: Object
query: "Sencha Touch"
tweets: Array (2)
__proto__: Object

stores: Array (0)
tweetsStore: Object
__proto__: Object

• I want these tweets to be stored in the data property, because after that I'm calling the model.save() method, which uses exactly that data.
• I tried the same logic, but done with stores and in that case the association is working fine.

Thank you for the attention.

[mitchellsimoens]

That is because the associated data (event if returned from a server call) is not attached to the data at all. It's on the store/model instance that is created from the association.

[ntkonstantinov]

Hmm. That's a little bit strange, because when I'm using a json object coming from a server(invoked before that with store.load() func) the results are different. I mean in the data field of the "A" class, I see the collection of "B" classes. And the association is A has many B. Why is that happening ? If I use a store, defined with models and associations the data is ok. But if I take the json result from server and hardcode it in the model's constructor or pass it as a parameter in Ext.create() function, the result is different ...

[JFFortierQc]

Ok
Human mistake
configs: {}
instead of
config: {}

Don't tell anyone