Thank you for reporting this bug. We will make it our priority to review this report.
  1. #1
    Sencha Premium Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    128
    Vote Rating
    2
    audra is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default No appearance constructor for Mask...

    No appearance constructor for Mask...


    Can you add one please?

  2. #2
    Sencha Premium Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    128
    Vote Rating
    2
    audra is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    or add a mask() call that accepts an appearance...

  3. #3
    Sencha - GXT Dev Team
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    2,640
    Vote Rating
    80
    Colin Alworth is just really nice Colin Alworth is just really nice Colin Alworth is just really nice Colin Alworth is just really nice Colin Alworth is just really nice

      0  

    Default


    Masks should be consistent across an application, and so only one instance exists. To replace the appearance then, create your own custom MaskAppearance implementation, and create a replace-with declaration in your module file, after the GXT inherits statements:

    Code:
      <replace-with class="my.project.client.CustomMaskAppearance">
        <when-type-is class="com.sencha.gxt.core.client.dom.Mask.MaskAppearance" />
      </replace-with>

  4. #4
    Sencha Premium Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    128
    Vote Rating
    2
    audra is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    I agree that all Masks should be similar but i have masks that require different content structures.

    Can you at least change the constructor from private to protected so I can extend the Mask class?

    Thanks,
    Audra

Thread Participants: 1

film izle

hd film izle

film sitesi

takipci kazanma sitesi

takipci kazanma sitesi

güzel olan herşey

takipci alma sitesi

komik eğlenceli videolar