1. #1
    Sencha User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Lyon, France
    Posts
    206
    Vote Rating
    4
    christophe.geiser will become famous soon enough

      0  

    Default [4.1] Uncaught TypeError with Ext.selection.Model

    [4.1] Uncaught TypeError with Ext.selection.Model


    Hi all
    this part of the code (Ext.selection.Model) creates an Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'id' of undefined later in the execution.
    Code:
    doSelect: function(records, keepExisting, suppressEvent) {
            var me = this,
                record;
    
    
            if (me.locked || !me.store) {
                return;
            }
            if (typeof records === "number") {
                records = [me.store.getAt(records)];
               records = me.store.getAt(records); // this would be better, instead of above
            }
            if (me.selectionMode == "SINGLE" && records) {
                record = records.length ? records[0] : records;
                
    
                me.doSingleSelect(record, suppressEvent);
            } else {
                me.doMultiSelect(records, keepExisting, suppressEvent);
            }
        },
    It happens when 'records' is a number for which no records exist in the store. We should test the existence of record being passed to doSingleSelect and doMultiSelect :
    if(record) {me.doSingleSelect ...

    Cheers,
    C.

  2. #2
    Sencha - Senior Forum Manager mitchellsimoens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    34,107
    Vote Rating
    453
    mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of mitchellsimoens has much to be proud of

      0  

    Default


    So you are trying to select something that doesn't exist?
    Mitchell Simoens @SenchaMitch
    Sencha Inc, Senior Forum Manager
    ________________
    http://www.JSONPLint.com - Source to lint your JSONP!

    Check out my GitHub, lots of nice things for Ext JS 4 and Sencha Touch 2
    https://github.com/mitchellsimoens

    Think my support is good? Get more personalized support via a support subscription. https://www.sencha.com/store/

    Need more help with your app? Hire Sencha Services services@sencha.com

    Want to learn Sencha Touch 2? Check out Sencha Touch in Action that is almost in print!

    When posting code, please use BBCode's CODE tags.

  3. #3
    Sencha User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Lyon, France
    Posts
    206
    Vote Rating
    4
    christophe.geiser will become famous soon enough

      0  

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by mitchellsimoens View Post
    So you are trying to select something that doesn't exist?

    Well, I think the framework is trying to somehow ...


    This type of scenario occurs for instance when user tries to navigate though a boundlist for which the store is empty. At some point in Ext.selection.DataViewModel, we have :
    Code:
    onNavKey: function(step) {
    step = step || 1;
           var me = this,
               view = me.view,
               selected = me.getSelection()[0], // in this case, no selection
               numRecords = me.view.store.getCount(),
               idx;
    
    
    
    
           if (selected) {
               idx = view.indexOf(view.getNode(selected)) + step;
           } else {
               idx = 0;
           }
    
    
    
    
           if (idx < 0) {
               idx = numRecords - 1;
           } else if (idx >= numRecords) {
               idx = 0;
           }
           me.select(idx);// so idx = 0 at this point !
    }
    This leads to doSelect function above with records argument = 0, and hence the problem:
    Code:
    me.doSingleSelect(record, suppressEvent) // here record == undefined 
    The real problem in this case is that
    if (me.selectionMode == "SINGLE" && records)
    will always be true.


    Thanks for looking into this,
    C.