Hybrid View
-
19 Aug 2012 10:24 PM #1
Mobile app with sencha-touch
Mobile app with sencha-touch
I wrote a ppt named "Mobile app with sencha-touch" for my colleagues in other sub-companies.I propose a new word "WebView" to instead one of the "Hybrid" mode.I have also attached the the sencha practice of an android project. I hope you give me some feedback.

PPT URL: http://www.slideshare.net/fch415/mob...h-sencha-touch
-
20 Aug 2012 5:01 AM #2Sencha - Senior Forum Manager
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- St. Louis, MO
- Posts
- 33,637
- Vote Rating
- 435
In your index.html you are using <script> for your classes, why not use the loader instead so your build can pick it all up and build into one JS file?
Mitchell Simoens @SenchaMitch
Sencha Inc, Senior Forum Manager
________________
http://www.JSONPLint.com - Source to lint your JSONP!
Check out my GitHub, lots of nice things for Ext JS 4 and Sencha Touch 2
https://github.com/mitchellsimoens
Think my support is good? Get more personalized support via a support subscription. https://www.sencha.com/store/
Need more help with your app? Hire Sencha Services services@sencha.com
Want to learn Sencha Touch 2? Check out Sencha Touch in Action that is almost in print!
When posting code, please use BBCode's CODE tags.
-
20 Aug 2012 6:00 PM #3
I very like sencha's dynamic class-loading system,Not like the module file loading solution in earlier other JS frameworks. This system is very much like Java(Coincides with what I thought before), I having realized it in the next version of my JSDK: http://jsdk2.sourceforge.net/
Why not use DCL in index.html?
1)Main reason: early in the project, finishing class depends is cumbersome, which is why we temporarily use the traditional write way.
1)Other reason: Because our build.xml(under Ant) only compress each js, not join them and rewrite index.html.
I feel DCL(for JS) is more suitable for the development period, rather than the running period.


Reply With Quote