Thank you for reporting this bug. We will make it our priority to review this report.
  1. #1
    Sencha User rbraddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    144
    Vote Rating
    7
    rbraddy is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default SA 2.2 install on x64 CentOS 6.4 fails to run

    SA 2.2 install on x64 CentOS 6.4 fails to run


    I downloaded and installed SA 2.2 today. It fails to run:

    [rbraddy@SoftNAS-DEV Downloads]$ /home/rbraddy/SenchaArchitect/SenchaArchitect
    Loading Architect package "/home/rbraddy/.local/share/Sencha/Sencha Architect 2.2/xds-2.2.2.000991.ion"
    Loading Desktop Packager at "/home/rbraddy/.local/share/Sencha/Sencha Architect 2.2/runtime/sdp-1.1.1.398/SenchaArchitect"
    [rbraddy@SoftNAS-DEV Downloads]$ /home/rbraddy/.local/share/Sencha/Sencha Architect 2.2/runtime/sdp-1.1.1.398/SenchaArchitect --ion-entry-url=ionp:///index.html?production --ion-file=/home/rbraddy/.local/share/Sencha/Sencha Architect 2.2/xds-2.2.2.000991.ion --ion-enable-logging --ion-log-level=0 --architect=/home/rbraddy/SenchaArchitect/SenchaArchitect --disable-accelerated-compositing: symbol lookup error: /home/rbraddy/.local/share/Sencha/Sencha Architect 2.2/runtime/sdp-1.1.1.398/SenchaArchitect --ion-entry-url=ionp:///index.html?production --ion-file=/home/rbraddy/.local/share/Sencha/Sencha Architect 2.2/xds-2.2.2.000991.ion --ion-enable-logging --ion-log-level=0 --architect=/home/rbraddy/SenchaArchitect/SenchaArchitect --disable-accelerated-compositing: undefined symbol: gtk_widget_get_realized

    [rbraddy@SoftNAS-DEV Downloads]$

  2. #2
    Sencha - Architect Dev Team Phil.Strong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Olney, MD
    Posts
    1,879
    Vote Rating
    62
    Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice

      0  

    Default


    After some more research by one of the Desktop Packager engineers here's what he found:

    as of Chromium 26, they require a baseline of GTK 2.24. CentOS is using 2.18 so if you upgrade you'll get things working.

    fwiw: 2.18 was released on 23 September 2009 which is 4 years old.
    Phil Strong
    @philstrong
    #SenchaArchitect
    Sencha Architect Development Team

  3. #3
    Sencha User rbraddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    144
    Vote Rating
    7
    rbraddy is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    Phil,

    Thanks for that information. Unfortunately, it does not appear there's a yum package available for GTK 2.2 for CentOS 6.x available, so it may have to be built from source, which also brings with it other dependencies...

    Given that CentOS 6.x / Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.x is the latest version for several years now, perhaps Sencha should provide some Release Notes or other how-to details on how to make its product work properly in these popular Linux environments, or at least state what the pre-requisites for a given release; otherwise, a lot of us will waste time trying to upgrade to SA 2.2 only to find it doesn't work and there's no detailed instructions on how to get it to work...

    Meanwhile, I suppose I will just stick with the older version of SA 2.1 which works fine.

    Thanks
    Rick

  4. #4
    Sencha - Architect Dev Team Phil.Strong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Olney, MD
    Posts
    1,879
    Vote Rating
    62
    Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice

      0  

    Default


    We are bound to that which Chromium supports: https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/95411?hl=en

    I'd call this the first step back in support I've seen since the move from Qt Webkit to Chromium.

    Sorry Rick.
    Phil Strong
    @philstrong
    #SenchaArchitect
    Sencha Architect Development Team

  5. #5
    Sencha User rbraddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    144
    Vote Rating
    7
    rbraddy is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    So is the answer effectively "you're on your own - go find the right version of Chromium for CentOS 6.x, build it from source, along with whatever dependencies it may have, if you have to, and good luck with it?"

    Has the product even been tested with the latest version of CentOS / RHEL? If so, could we get some documentation on how to proceed, please?

  6. #6
    Sencha - Architect Dev Team Phil.Strong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Olney, MD
    Posts
    1,879
    Vote Rating
    62
    Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice

      0  

    Default


    I don't know if this will work but after some googling...
    http://www.if-not-true-then-false.co...-red-hat-rhel/

    We're not saying "you're on your own" I'm just giving you the facts which is that Chromium doesn't support this distro.
    Phil Strong
    @philstrong
    #SenchaArchitect
    Sencha Architect Development Team

  7. #7
    Sencha User rbraddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    144
    Vote Rating
    7
    rbraddy is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default FAIL

    FAIL


    FAIL:

    # yum install google-chrome-stable
    Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security
    Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
    * base: mirror.fdcservers.net
    * epel: fedora.mirror.nexicom.net
    * extras: mirrors.einstein.yu.edu
    * rpmforge: repoforge.spinellicreations.com
    * updates: centos.icyboards.com
    Setting up Install Process
    Resolving Dependencies
    --> Running transaction check
    ---> Package google-chrome-stable.x86_64 0:24.0.1312.52-175374 will be updated
    ---> Package google-chrome-stable.x86_64 0:28.0.1500.45-205727 will be an update
    --> Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15)(64bit) for package: google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.45-205727.x86_64
    --> Finished Dependency Resolution
    Error: Package: google-chrome-stable-28.0.1500.45-205727.x86_64 (google-chrome)
    Requires: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.15)(64bit)
    You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
    You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

    (doesn't work with --skip-broken either)

  8. #8
    Sencha - Architect Dev Team Phil.Strong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Olney, MD
    Posts
    1,879
    Vote Rating
    62
    Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice Phil.Strong is just really nice

      0  

    Default


    The workaround here might be to use virtualbox or something like it to run Ubuntu 12.04 from CentOS install. That's our most tested version of Linux. Of course this may not be possible depending on corporate policies. I get worried about messing with too much on your main box as I don't want you to get into a place where you can't boot up!
    Phil Strong
    @philstrong
    #SenchaArchitect
    Sencha Architect Development Team

  9. #9
    Sencha User rbraddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    144
    Vote Rating
    7
    rbraddy is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    Yeah, my dev box is VMware Workstation, so I have VM snapshots... in case something goes wrong.

    At this point, because Chrome is linked to an incompatible C++ run-time library, looks like we're done. We won't be adopting SA 2.2 or any other future version until this gets resolved, as we're certainly not switching off of CentOS / RHEL for any other Linux.

    My recommendation would be for Sencha to release note that it currently does not support Red Hat Enterprise Linux or CentOS (or other Linux platforms with incompatible Chromium environments) until this is resolved.

  10. #10
    Sencha User rbraddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    144
    Vote Rating
    7
    rbraddy is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    Did this ever get resolved?

    I'm now stuck... I have another developer who used SA 2.2 to develop a project that I cannot open in SA 2.0 and still can't get SA 2.2 to work on CentOS 6.3 / 6.4 due to Chromium dependencies.

    Has anyone resolved this issue or have instructions for how to get SA 2.2 to work on Linux?

    Thanks
    Rick

Thread Participants: 2

Turkiyenin en sevilen filmlerinin yer aldigi xnxx internet sitemiz olan ve porn sex tarzi bir site olan mobil porno izle sitemiz gercekten dillere destan bir durumda herkesin sevdigi bir site olarak tarihe gececege benziyor. Sitenin en belirgin ozelliklerinden birisi de Turkiyede gercekten kaliteli ve muntazam, duzenli porno izle siteleri olmamasidir. Bu yuzden iste. Ayrica en net goruntu kalitesine sahip adresinde yayinlanmaktadir. Mesela diğer sitelerimizden bahsedecek olursak, en iyi hd porno video arşivine sahip bir siteyiz. "The Best anal porn videos and slut anus, big asses movies set..." hd porno faketaxi