1. #1
    Ext GWT Premium Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    34
    Vote Rating
    0
    chicagoarchitect is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Question GPL License V3 Clarification

    GPL License V3 Clarification


    Per my understanding, I do not have to publish any code to the public if I use the software under the GPL License and not modify it. Basically, If I am just using the libraries, I should not have any problem. Can ExtJS please clarify this. Also, here is what I have directly from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html:

    Does the GPL require that source code of modified versions be posted to the public? The GPL does not require you to release your modified version, or any part of it. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization.
    But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's users, under the GPL.
    Thus, the GPL gives permission to release the modified program in certain ways, and not in other ways; but the decision of whether to release it is up to you.


    Thanks

  2. #2
    Ext User
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    190
    Vote Rating
    0
    esoteric is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    Why open a new thread? Please go see the License Change thread. (Use the search feature)

    Can a moderator please merge or delete this.

  3. #3
    Ext User sheesh-kebab's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Washington, DC/Falls Church, VA
    Posts
    40
    Vote Rating
    0
    sheesh-kebab is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    it looks like commercial license is also not very commercial friendly...

    "a. Developer License:

    Subject to the payment of the fee required for a Commercial Developer License and subject
    to the terms and conditions of this License Agreement, We grant to You a revocable, non-
    transferable and non-exclusive license (i)"hmm... answers, EXT, answers...

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Sencha User vmorale4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    189
    Vote Rating
    0
    vmorale4 is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by esoteric View Post
    Why open a new thread? Please go see the License Change thread. (Use the search feature)
    That thread has degenerated into great big fight. He has an honest question, and between all the rambling over there I don't think his question would get answered ...

  6. #6
    Ext GWT Premium Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    34
    Vote Rating
    0
    chicagoarchitect is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    vmorale84, thanks . That was my exact reason for this thread. Moreover, I'm a mygwt user, so I felt this was a more appropriate section of the forum for me. I don't want this thread to turn into a philosophical debate contest. I just want a clarification of use vs modification.
    Last edited by chicagoarchitect; 23 Apr 2008 at 5:14 AM. Reason: missed a word

  7. #7
    Sencha User jack.slocum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    6,955
    Vote Rating
    16
    jack.slocum will become famous soon enough

      0  

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by sheesh-kebab View Post
    it looks like commercial license is also not very commercial friendly...

    "a. Developer License:

    Subject to the payment of the fee required for a Commercial Developer License and subject
    to the terms and conditions of this License Agreement, We grant to You a revocable, non-
    transferable and non-exclusive license (i)"hmm... answers, EXT, answers...
    sheesh-kebab, please see my reply in this thread about the "revocable" clause.

    http://extjs.com/forum/showthread.ph...744#post157744

    Before posting advice to people, you really should be sure you know what you are talking about. Thanks.


    For the original poster, I don't think this a question a developer should be answering, but instead an attorney. However, my two cents on the GPL is that if you use Ext GWT to develop your application under GPL, you must distribute your application under GPL. Again, this is just my two cents.
    Jack Slocum
    Ext JS Founder
    Original author of Ext JS 1, 2 & 3.
    Twitter: @jackslocum
    jack@extjs.com

  8. #8
    Ext GWT Premium Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    34
    Vote Rating
    0
    chicagoarchitect is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    Jack,

    Thanks for responding. I love your work, but with all due respect, shouldn't the ExtJS understand the license(s) it is binding it's software to? If the only response is that I should consult an attorney, then ExtJS has not understood the implications of going from LGPL to GPL.

  9. #9
    Ext User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8
    Vote Rating
    0
    hucmuc is on a distinguished road

      0  

    Default


    Quote Originally Posted by chicagoarchitect View Post
    Jack,

    Thanks for responding. I love your work, but with all due respect, shouldn't the ExtJS understand the license(s) it is binding it's software to? If the only response is that I should consult an attorney, then ExtJS has not understood the implications of going from LGPL to GPL.
    Totally agree. I've seen this happen so many times. Bottom line: they want to be paid and that's okay. Making it GPL is basically making it closed software. No one and I mean no one that works for a company uses GPL software per se. You got to pay for it. The standard response "consult your attorney" gives it away.

    I think a lot of people are pissed because they have contributed back into the software. I bet you that extjs in the end will grant these people exceptions and basically make new customers pay. This is fine.

    The extjs people are doing a terrible job of explaining or transitioning existing customers. Companies think that GPL is opensource friendly and is a good "marketing" idea. God, everyone knows that GPL is bad.

  10. #10
    Sencha User jack.slocum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    6,955
    Vote Rating
    16
    jack.slocum will become famous soon enough

      0  

    Default


    Making it GPL is basically making it closed software.
    That is so far from the truth. It makes it open source for open source. The GPL is the only open source license that makes sure everything done with it is also open source. If anything, it is the epitomy of open source and proliferates additional open source works.

    If the only response is that I should consult an attorney, then ExtJS has not understood the implications of going from LGPL to GPL.
    If we were to reply to these type of questions every time they were asked, we would need a full time team of 10s lawyers simply to answer them. I personally get more than I can count PER DAY. There is no way I (or anyone else at Ext JS) can analyse everyones usage and provide accurate information regarding their usage. In the case of Ext JS, there are so many different ways to use/integrate into an application and all have different licensing implications.
    Jack Slocum
    Ext JS Founder
    Original author of Ext JS 1, 2 & 3.
    Twitter: @jackslocum
    jack@extjs.com

film izle

hd film izle

film sitesi

takipci kazanma sitesi

takipci kazanma sitesi

güzel olan herşey

takipci alma sitesi

komik eğlenceli videolar