Ext.ux.form.SuperBoxSelect as seen on facebook and hotmail

[MarkB]

This makes me very happy ...

[mystix]

This makes me very happy ...

quick, buy him a beer.

[danh2000]

quick, buy him a beer.

I'll need a beer when I've finished this.

This makes me very happy ...

Then I may PM you if you fancy helping with some private early beta testing...?

[swarnendude]

Awesome work man!! Thank you very much for sharing!!

[nadim]

I am using a few of these superboxselects inside a fieldset within a form.

When I add items and run getValues() everything works as expected. When I remove items, the removed items still show up in getValues. Any suggestions?

-N

[nadim]

Here is how I am using it:

var wdCombo = new Ext.ux.form.SuperBoxSelect({
id: 'wd',
displayField: 'description',
emptyText: '(All...)',
fieldLabel: 'wd',
name: 'wd',
mode: 'local',
store: jsonwdStore,
triggerAction: 'all',
valueField: 'pk',
width: 213,
listeners: {
additem: a_func,
removeitem: a_func
}

both a_func is the same function and called for both events. When I remove something, a_func calls getValues() and still sees old values present in the list.

[danh2000]

Hi Nadim,

I've just tested this and everything works as expected using Ext 2.2.1 - Ext 3.0.1

When did you download the SBS component - is it possible that you have an old version of the code that has since been fixed?

If you are still having issues, please post an isolated test case that I can copy and paste, and some instructions about how to re-produce the error. Also please let me know the browsers tested and the version of Ext you are using.

Thanks,

Dan

[nadim]

I downloaded it within the last week, i'm working on isolating it right now. If I find the problem on my own I will post back here.

-N

[danh2000]

Here's what I just tried:

removeitem: function(sbs,v){
    console.log(sbs.getValue());
} 

I'd like to know what your listener looks like - I'll take a look when you post a test case.

Thanks.

[danh2000]

I've found a problem when using BasicForm.getValues() in the listener - I guess you were using this too?

If this is the case, don't worry about the test case.