It is possible to create a serious BUG REPORT thread for EXT CORE only?

[44gatti]

I have find a lot of bugs.. also related with Events, event sequencing, event functions. POST HERE some BUGS and STRANGE BEHAVIOURS !!!
I WANT TO BELIEVE

example: function hasFxBLock() -->

with an Ext.Element el
console.log(el.hasFxBlock()); return a function not a boolean value..

[44gatti]

use move and shift functions with complex event apps!

[44gatti]

post something guys...

[Animal]

you first!

[VinylFox]

...
example: function hasFxBLock() -->

with an Ext.Element el
console.log(el.hasFxBlock()); return a function not a boolean value..

I am unable to reproduce your problem with a simple test case.

Ext.get('test').fadeOut({block:true,duration:20});
Ext.get('test').hasFxBlock(); // returns true

Ext.get('test').fadeOut({duration:20});
Ext.get('test').hasFxBlock(); // returns false

Please provide a test case and ext core version number with bug reports. See this thread on posting a useful bug report.

[44gatti]

ed = Ext.get('test');
        ed.stopFx();
        console.log(ed.hasActiveFx()); //--> return UNDEFINED not FALSE boolean value
        ed.shift({ 
                        width:200,
                        height: 100, 
                        opacity: 1, 
                        easing: 'easeOut',
                        duration: 0.4
        });    
        console.log(typeof ed.hasActiveFx()=='function'); // ok return object reference not TRUE value..
console.log(ed.hasActiveFx()); // --> function

//THAT's ALL FOLKS.. I'm mad? I have to RTFM forever?

[Animal]

You can use it. It's a kind of bug. A function is a truthy value, so you can use it in an if test.

I suppose the function should be changed from

    hasActiveFx : function(){
        return getQueue(this.dom.id)[0];
    },

to

    hasActiveFx : function(){
        return !!getQueue(this.dom.id)[0];
    },

[44gatti]

I know that, but a function is not a primitive. I think i s only a conceptual bug An object reference is different from a primitive value when passed to a closure or anonymous function in complex apps..
OK I'M NOT SO MAD..