Search Type: Posts; User: YetAnotherFrank

Search: Search took 0.03 seconds.

  1. Okay, so Ext support told me that there already is a bug report for the wrong version number.
  2. Did you notice that the version number in the code still says "3.4.0"?
  3. In the meantime, we found a good workaround.
    We patch Ext.Action with the following code, so that a copied action "remembers" its original in initialConfig.baseAction. When its initialConfig is...
  4. Then Ext.Panel.setIconClass does not use the "removeClass" function properly.
    In the docs it says: "This method will replace any existing icon class if one has already been set". But ...
  5. Ext version tested:

    Ext 3.2.2

    Adapter used:
  6. Ext version tested:

    Ext 3.2.0

    Adapter used:
  7. I see. Does that mean that in principle, you agree that the behavior should change, or do you still have to evaluate this?
    I think the reason that so few people implement reusable actions may be the...
  8. Thanks for setting a status!
    Can you explain why you think the change should be deferred? What about changing the "possible fix" to only not-copying the config object if it is an Action? Do you...
  9. Ext version tested:

    Ext 3.2.1

    Adapter used:
  10. Thanks for your quick reaction. We appreciate this! It's always good to get rid of a patch.
    Does "core" mean it is fixed in Ext JS and Ext Core?
  11. Ext version tested:

    Ext 3.1.0
    Ext Core 3.1.0
    Ext 3.0.3

    Adapter used:

Results 1 to 11 of 11