In ExtJS 4.1.3 ext-all-dev raises exception when trying to add a record to the buffered store. Is there a reason why adding records is bad practice? Should insert? be used instead?
add method may not be called on a buffered store
In ExtJS 4.1.3 ext-all-dev raises exception when trying to add a record to the buffered store. Is there a reason why adding records is bad practice? Should insert? be used instead?
AFAIK you are messing with the page maps of data when adding.
Mitchell Simoens @LikelyMitch
Sencha Inc, Senior Software Engineer
________________
Learn BBCode and use it!
Check out my GitHub, lots of nice things for Ext JS 4 and Sencha Touch 2
https://github.com/mitchellsimoens
Think my support is good? Get more personalized support via a support subscription. https://www.sencha.com/store/
Need more help with your app? Hire Sencha Services services@sencha.com
Want to learn Sencha Touch 2? Check out Sencha Touch in Action that is in print!
When posting code, please use BBCode's CODE tags.
Please elaborate
Please invest more effort into maintaining backwards compatibility as you produce future releases; I have invested a lot of time into learning and using this framework, but I frequently get the impression you are treating it more like an application library for a couple of special clients than taking seriously the amount of pain you cause when you rip out major functionality like this.
Having the ability to use "buffered" data stores to do batch type updates to my server is a huge win for me in ext-4.0.7; and now I also need to solve this problem... Time to diff the code and subclass Ext.data.Store, or could you recommend a better approach to using the data store interface to do
time deferred batch updates.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote