23 Apr 2008 3:48 AM #1
GPL License V3 Clarification
Per my understanding, I do not have to publish any code to the public if I use the software under the GPL License and not modify it. Basically, If I am just using the libraries, I should not have any problem. Can ExtJS please clarify this. Also, here is what I have directly from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html:
Does the GPL require that source code of modified versions be posted to the public? The GPL does not require you to release your modified version, or any part of it. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization.
But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's users, under the GPL.
Thus, the GPL gives permission to release the modified program in certain ways, and not in other ways; but the decision of whether to release it is up to you.
23 Apr 2008 4:12 AM #2
Why open a new thread? Please go see the License Change thread. (Use the search feature)
Can a moderator please merge or delete this.Erik
My Plugins: [2.x] Plugin : Grid HeaderForm (Ext.ux.grid.HeaderForm)
23 Apr 2008 4:54 AM #3
it looks like commercial license is also not very commercial friendly...
"a. Developer License:
Subject to the payment of the fee required for a Commercial Developer License and subject
to the terms and conditions of this License Agreement, We grant to You a revocable, non-
transferable and non-exclusive license (i)"hmm... answers, EXT, answers...
23 Apr 2008 4:56 AM #4
23 Apr 2008 4:56 AM #5
23 Apr 2008 5:06 AM #6
vmorale84, thanks . That was my exact reason for this thread. Moreover, I'm a mygwt user, so I felt this was a more appropriate section of the forum for me. I don't want this thread to turn into a philosophical debate contest. I just want a clarification of use vs modification.
Last edited by chicagoarchitect; 23 Apr 2008 at 5:14 AM. Reason: missed a word
23 Apr 2008 5:13 AM #7
Before posting advice to people, you really should be sure you know what you are talking about. Thanks.
For the original poster, I don't think this a question a developer should be answering, but instead an attorney. However, my two cents on the GPL is that if you use Ext GWT to develop your application under GPL, you must distribute your application under GPL. Again, this is just my two cents.
23 Apr 2008 5:30 AM #8
Thanks for responding. I love your work, but with all due respect, shouldn't the ExtJS understand the license(s) it is binding it's software to? If the only response is that I should consult an attorney, then ExtJS has not understood the implications of going from LGPL to GPL.
23 Apr 2008 6:30 AM #9
I think a lot of people are pissed because they have contributed back into the software. I bet you that extjs in the end will grant these people exceptions and basically make new customers pay. This is fine.
The extjs people are doing a terrible job of explaining or transitioning existing customers. Companies think that GPL is opensource friendly and is a good "marketing" idea. God, everyone knows that GPL is bad.
23 Apr 2008 7:18 AM #10Making it GPL is basically making it closed software.
If the only response is that I should consult an attorney, then ExtJS has not understood the implications of going from LGPL to GPL.